Complaints Policy

Hartwig Care Limited accepts and actively promotes the rights of service users to make complaints and to register comments and concerns about the services received. It is our intention to make the process of complaining or providing feedback easy to do so. We welcome complaints and view them as opportunities to learn, adapt, improve and provide better services. 

This policy is intended to ensure that complaints are dealt with properly and that all complaints or comments by service users and their relatives, carers and advocates are taken seriously.

The policy is not designed to apportion blame, to consider the possibility of negligence or to provide compensation. Employee’s actions, where applicable, will not be considered under this policy, Hartwig Care Limiteds Disciplinary Policy will instead be followed.

Hartwig Care Limited believes that failure to listen to or acknowledge complaints leads to an aggravation of problems and can increase service user dissatisfaction. The company supports the idea that most complaints if dealt with early, openly and honestly, can be sorted at a local level between the complainant and the organisation.

Hartwig Care Limited aims to ensure that its complaints procedure is properly and effectively implemented and that service users feel confident that their complaints and worries are listened to and acted upon promptly and fairly.

Specifically, it aims to ensure that:

• Carers, service users and their representatives are aware of how to complain and that the company provides easy to use opportunities for them to register their complaints.
• A named person will be responsible for the administration of the procedure.
• Every written complaint is acknowledged within 5 working days.
• All complaints are investigated within 21 days of being made.
• All complaints are responded to in writing within 28 days of being made.
• Complaints are dealt with promptly, fairly and sensitively, with due regard to the upset and worry that they can cause to both service users and staff.

1. The company accepts that all verbal complaints, no matter how seemingly unimportant, must be taken seriously.
2. Front-line care staff who receive a verbal complaint are expected to seek to solve the problem immediately.
3. If they cannot solve the problem immediately, they should refer this to their Coordinator to deal with the problem.
4. Staff are expected to remain polite, courteous, sympathetic and professional to the complainant. They are taught that there is nothing to be gained by adopting a defensive or aggressive attitude.
5. At all times in responding to the complaint, staff are encouraged to remain calm and respectful.
6. Staff should not make excuses or blame other staff.
7. If the complaint is being made on behalf of the service user by an advocate, it must first be verified that the person has permission to speak for the service user, especially if confidential information is involved. (It is very easy to assume that the advocate has the right or power to act for the service user when they may not). If in doubt it should be assumed that the service user’s explicit permission is needed prior to discussing the complaint with the advocate.
8. After talking the problem through, the manager or member of staff dealing with the complaint will suggest a course of action to resolve the complaint. If this course of action is acceptable then the member of staff should clarify the agreement with the complainant and agree on a way in which the results of the complaint will be communicated to the complainant (i.e. through another meeting or by letter).
9. All verbal complainants will be offered an outcome in writing.
10. If the suggested plan of action is not acceptable to the complainant, then the member of staff or manager will ask the complainant to put their complaint in writing to the Care Services Director. The complainant should be given a copy of the company’s complaints procedure if they do not already have one.
11. Details of all verbal and written complaints must be recorded in the Service Users journal.

Preliminary steps:

1. When we receive a written complaint it is passed to the named individual for that geographical area who records it in the Service Users journal and sends an acknowledgement letter within 5 working days to the complainant.
2. The named individual also includes the organisation’s complaints procedure for the complainant.
3. If necessary, further details are obtained from the complainant; if the complaint is not made by the service user but on the service user’s behalf, then the consent of the service user, preferably in writing, must be obtained from the complainant.
4. If applicable, the service user’s Social Worker will be informed of the complaint and kept informed of any development.
5. If the complaint raises potentially serious matters, advice could be sought from a legal advisor. If legal action is taken at this stage, any investigation by the organisation under the complaints procedure immediately ceases.
6. If a complaint raises safeguarding concerns then a referral will be made to the appropriate authority.

Investigation of the complaint by the organisation:

• Immediately on receipt of the complaint, the named individual will start an investigation and within 28 days should be in a position to provide a full explanation to the complainant, either in writing or by arranging a meeting with the individuals concerned.
• If the issues are too complex to complete the investigation within 28 days, the complainant will be informed of any delays.
• Where the complaint cannot be resolved between the parties, this will be referred to the relevant Adult and Health Services Complaints Department to investigate further.

Meeting:

• If a meeting is arranged, the complainant will be advised that they may, if they wish, bring a friend or relative or a representative such as an advocate.
• At the meeting, a detailed explanation of the results of the investigation will be given and also an apology if it is deemed appropriate (apologising for what has happened need not be an admission of liability).
• Such a meeting gives the company management the opportunity to show the complainant that the matter has been taken seriously and has been thoroughly investigated.

Follow-up action:

After the meeting, or if the complainant does not want a meeting, a written account of the investigation will be sent to the complainant. This includes details of how to approach the Local Authority, Care Quality Commission or Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman if the complainant is not satisfied with the outcome.

The outcomes of the investigation and the meeting are recorded in the Service user’s journal and any shortcomings in company procedures will be identified and acted upon. The company management formally reviews all complaints each week as part of its quality monitoring and improvement procedures to identify the lessons learned and ensure there are outcomes for all complaints made.

This company takes seriously any comments or complaints regarding its service. However, there are service users who can be treated as vexatious complainers due to the inability of the company to meet the outcomes of the complaints, which are never resolved. Vexatious complainers need to be dealt with by the arbitration service in order that the time factor required to investigate repeatedly becomes less of a burden on the organisation, its staff and other service users.

Since October 2010 the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman can consider complaints from people who arrange or fund their own adult social care. This is in addition to complaints about care arranged and funded by local authorities, which the LGO has dealt with for more than 35 years.

The LGO’s new role includes those who ‘self-fund’ from their own resources or have a personalised budget. It will ensure that everyone has access to the same independent Ombudsman service regardless of how the care service is funded. In most cases, they will only consider a complaint once the care provider has been given a reasonable opportunity to deal with the situation. It is a free service. Their job is to investigate complaints in a fair and independent way. They do not take sides and they do not champion complaints.

They are independent of politicians, local authorities, government department, advocacy and campaigning groups, the care industry, and the Care Quality Commission. They are not a regulator and do not inspect care providers.

The short film linked below provides an overview of the new adult social care service. It explains their new role and how the service will benefit both service users and care providers. You can also download a free copy of the film and a copy of the manuscript.

https://www.lgo.org.uk/adult-social-care/

They are fully independent of the Care Quality Commission (CQC). They deal with individual injustices that people have suffered and CQC will refer to all such complaints to them. CQC deals with complaints about registered services as a whole and does not consider individual matters. They can share information with CQC but only when they feel it is appropriate. CQC will redirect individual complaints to them, and they will inform CQC about outcomes that point at regulatory failures.

Any Service User part or wholly funded by their Local Authority can complain directly to the Complaints Manager (Adults) who are employed directly via the local authority.

The Regional Operations Director is responsible for organising and coordinating training on the complaints procedure.

All staff receive training in dealing with and responding to verbal and written complaints. The complaints policy and procedures are included in new staff members’ induction training. In order to learn from mistakes, staff group meetings and supervisions are used to discuss formal complaint issues, in order that all staff can share and learn from the experiences.